Archive for the ‘The Market’ Category

On the Edge with Gerald Celente – 20 August 2010 (1/3)…

Posted on 2010 08, 25 by admin

Gerald Celente On The Edge With Max Keiser (Finance, War and Revolt) Part 2 of 3

THERE WILL BE NO DOUBLE DIP…..

Posted on 2010 08, 23 by admin
Sweeping the pengő inflation banknotes after t...
Image via Wikipedia

by Egon von Greyerz – Matterhorn Asset Management

No, there will be no double dip. It will be a lot worse. The world economy will soon go into an accelerated and precipitous decline which will make the 2007 to early 2009 downturn seem like a walk in the park. The world financial system has temporarily been on life support by trillions of printed dollars that governments call money. But the effect of this massive money printing is ephemeral since it is not possible to save a world economy built on worthless paper by creating more of the same. Nevertheless, governments will continue to print since this is the only remedy they know. Therefore, we are soon likely to enter a phase of money printing of a magnitude that the world has never experienced.  But this will not save the Western World which is likely to go in to a decline lasting at least 20 years but most probably a lot longer.

The End of an Era

The hyperinflationary depression that many western countries, including the US and the UK, will experience is likely to mark the end of an era that has lasted over 200 years since the industrial revolution.  A major part of the growth in the last 100 years and especially in the last 40 years has been built on an unsustainable build-up of debt levels. These debt levels will continue to swell for another few years until the coming hyperinflation in the West leads to a destruction of real asset values and a debt implosion.

In the last 100 years the Western world has experienced a historically unprecedented growth in production, in inventions and technical developments leading to a major increase in the standard of living. During the same period government debt, as well as private debt have grown exponentially leading to a major increase in inflation compared to previous centuries.

[1]

Until the early 1970s the growth in credit to GDP had been going up gradually since the creation of the Fed in 1913.. But from 1971 when Nixon abolished gold backing of the dollar, virtually all of the growth in the Western world has come from the massive increase in credit rather than from real growth of the economy. The US consumer price index was stable for 200 years until the early 1900s. From 1971 to 2010 CPI went up by almost 500%. The reason for this is uncontrolled credit creation and money printing. Total US debt went from $9 trillion in 1971 to $59 trillion today and this excludes unfunded liabilities of anywhere from $70 to $110 trillion. US nominal GDP went from $1.1 trillion to $14.5 trillion between 1971 and 2010.  So it has taken an increase in borrowings of $50 trillion to produce an increase in annual GDP of $13 trillion over a 40 year period. Without this massive increase in debt, the US would probably have had negative growth for most of the last 39 years.

Total US debt to GDP is now 380% and is likely to escalate substantially.

[2]

Russian grain export ban comes into force…

Posted on 2010 08, 15 by admin

Disasters undermine Russians’ faith in the state

FT,

Outside the Preobrazhenskoye cemetery in eastern Moscow, Muscovites hawking books and trinkets are still in shock from the scorching heat and choking smog that filled the Russian capital and made it hell on earth for nearly a week.

“People couldn’t breathe,” said one. “The authorities did nothing,” said Nadezhda, a pensioner selling flowers.

Inside the cemetery gates, gravediggers are taking respite from a surge in funerals that first grew as temperatures reached record levels and then climbed, as toxic smog from forest and peat bog fires shrouded the city. Death rates doubled in recent days, according to a senior Moscow health official, as the elderly and those suffering from bronchial and heart problems were hit.

MORE IMPORTANT:

A ban on Russian grain exports ordered by Prime Minister Vladimir Putin came into force on Sunday, with the government battling to keep down prices of basic foodstuffs amid a record drought.

According to a government decree signed by Putin on August 5, the ban will extend from August 15 up until December 31, although the powerful premier has indicated it may even extend beyond that date if the harvest is bad.

Russia, the world’s number three wheat exporter last year, has already warned that its grain harvest this year will be just 60-65 million tonnes, compared to 97 million tonnes in 2009.

The drought amid the worst ever heatwave in Russia’s history has ruined one quarter of the country’s crops, according to President Dmitry Medvedev.

The export ban is aimed at keeping the Russian domestic market well supplied with grain to prevent sharp rises in prices. Russia’s leaders, acutely nervous of social unrest, will be keen to avoid any discontent over food prices.

The New Push for a Global Currency…New IMF Strategy Document Charts Launch Of “Bancor” Global Currency…

Posted on 2010 08, 11 by admin

by Izabella Kaminska

FT Alphaville missed this IMF paper when it first came out in April, 2010.

Authored by Reza Moghadam, director of the IMF’s strategy, policy and review department, it discusses how the IMF sees the International Monetary System evolving after the financial crisis.

We’ll cut to the chase and draw readers’ attention to the final bubble in the following chart, found on page 4:

null

Which means, in the eyes of the IMF at least, the best way to ensure the stability of the international monetary system (post crisis) is actually by launching a global currency.

And that, the IMF says, is largely because sovereigns — as they stand — cannot be trusted to redistribute surplus reserves, or battle their deficits, themselves.

The ongoing buildup of such imbalances, meanwhile, only makes the system increasingly vulnerable to shocks. It’s also a process that’s ultimately unsustainable for all, says the IMF.

Or as they put it:

The global crisis of 2008/09, for all its costs, has not jeopardized international monetary stability, and the IMS is not on the verge of collapse. That said, the current system has serious imperfections that feed and facilitate policies—of reserves accumulation and reserves creation—that are ultimately unsustainable and, until they are reversed, expose the system to risks and shocks that a reformed system could minimize.

All in all, the IMF believes there has simply been too much reserve hoarding going on:

Reserve accumulation has accelerated dramatically in the past decade, particularly since the 2003-4. At the end of 2009, reserves had risen to 13 percent of global GDP, doubling from their 2000 level, and over 50 percent of total imports of goods and services. Emerging market holdings rose to 32 percent of their GDP (26 percent excluding China). Twenty-seven of the top 40 reserve holders, accounting for over 90 percent of total reserve holdings, recorded doubledigit average growth in reserves over 1999-2008.

Holdings have also become increasingly concentrated, with over half the total held by only five countries. These numbers exclude substantial foreign assets of the official sector not recorded as reserves, including in sovereign wealth funds (SWFs), and yet invested in liquid, dollar denominated financial instruments, that have grown even more in recent years.1

Of course, in the first instance, the solution probably lies in closer collaboration between sovereigns, most likely via the more active use of such things as special drawing rights, says the IMF.

But in the end, a global currency makes the most sense, the paper concludes — especially since the SDR is currently just an accounting tool that draws on the freely usable currencies of member states , not an actual currency itself.

The Bank Crisis and the Glass-Steagall Act… [for prosperity's sake..]

Posted on 2010 07, 15 by rockingjude

Freefalling rates spark fears dry bulk crash has arrived…

Posted on 2010 07, 13 by rockingjude
MV Berge Athene, a bulk carrier of 225,200 DWT...
Image via Wikipedia

Baltic Dry Index hits lowest level for 13 months

THERE are fears the long-anticipated crash in the dry bulk market has arrived, as the Baltic Dry Index freefall continued for the 30th consecutive day to its lowest level in 13 months, as shipowners prepared to take delivery of record numbers of new panamax and capesize bulk carriers in the second half of 2010.

“I think it could get fairly ugly,” said a prominent Europe-based operator of dry bulk tonnage, who declined to be named.

“Percentage wise, [rates] can probably come off another 50%, to a bit above operating cost levels,” he added, with stronger demand for dry bulk commodities only to return with cheaper transportation costs.

Declining shipments of iron ore and coal to China (which employ nearly half the world’s bulk carrier fleet) have seen panamax and capesize earnings collapse in the past six weeks, losing around 65% in value.

Capesize rates alone on the major Brazil-China route today fell to under $30,000 per day, compared with nearly $84,000 per day in late May.

Darkening an already bleak picture is what some analysts are calling a tsunami of newbuilding tonnage against a deteriorating outlook for commodities shipments forecast to rise 8% to 3.2bn tonnes this year.

Some 23 capesize vessels are set for delivery each month until the end of the year, according to fresh forecasts, which allow for 20% to be delayed. That compares with average monthly deliveries of 16 in the first five months of 2010, which saw the fleet grow by more than 23%, to over 1,000 vessels.

The Gulf Oil Spill – Too many coincidences…

Posted on 2010 07, 13 by rockingjude

By: Dave -Uncommon Sense

April 20: Deepwater Horizon explodes.

84 days later, the leak continues spewing a much debated number of gallons per day into the Gulf of Mexico (estimates range from 800,000 to 3 million gallons/day).

Speculation on the how’s, the who’s and the why’s behind this “accident” is running rampant in the media and on the internet. Yet for all the media coverage available – getting the facts on Tiger Woods’ extramarital activities or whether or not, Brittney Spears is wearing panties seems easier and the evidence is usually more conclusive. Maybe we need TMZ to cover this story instead of the mainstream media.

The official story is riddled with inconsistencies and missing details, but what is clear is that there are too many unexplained coincidences. These inconsistencies easily lend themselves to conspiracy theories that become difficult to simply dismiss.

Leading up to the accident is a list of strange events and coincidences…

In Praise of Financial Inequality…

Posted on 2010 07, 06 by rockingjude
World map showing inflation, updated for 2009....
Image via Wikipedia
BY: Henry Oliner
When citizens expect higher taxes and inflation they will shift from financial assets to tangible assets. One can enjoy jewelry, real estate, antique cars, new furniture, vacations, boats, art and collectibles without having to pay tax on their enjoyment and can feel wealthier as their tangible assets inflate in value tax free (at least tax deferred if they ever actually sell it).


Higher taxes on investment income will surely drive more money into tangible assets. Expectation of higher inflation will increase the diversion. Inflation and taxes are two sides of the same coin; one monetary and one fiscal.  Both induce one to work and produce less. Inflation pressures quick consumption and the acquisition of tangible assets to avoid the loss of monetary value.


Financial assets are an investment in the future; tangible assets are an investment in today. Driving money out of investments for future growth into tangible assets hurts economic growth and retards long term thinking, a hallmark of both a civilized society and economic growth.


Not only is the enjoyment from tangible assets not taxed, it is not considered when we measure the equality of income distribution in America. This is why there was a growth in income inequality after the Reagan economic revolution, and this is also why it was not a bad thing.


As a result of lower taxes on financial assets and the lowering of inflation under Reagan vast amounts of money flowed out of the tangible assets where they were not counted and into financial assets where they were counted.  The financial assets created economic growth and jobs which drove unemployment down from their stagflation highs under Carter.


If Obama and the Congress succeed in raising taxes and igniting inflation we will see a shift back to tangible assets at the expense of a growing economy.  He will have succeeded in reducing income inequality and we will all be worse off for it.
Enhanced by Zemanta

Matthias Chang: Economic Crisis – The Next Round of Financial Slaughter…

Posted on 2010 07, 05 by rockingjude
G20 Leaders Summit on Financial Markets and th...
Image via Wikipedia
Global Research, June 29, 2010

In a November 2009 article, I forecasted that at the earliest, by the first quarter and the latest by the second quarter of 2010, the global economy would unravel.

Since the second quarter of 2009 and more so in the first quarter of 2010, the Obama administration, the G8, the international mass media, the IMF and the World Bank, all sang the chorus that the global economy is on “the road to recovery” and “the worst is behind us”.

While, the Dow (DJIA) “recovered” from the March lows of 2009 and shot above the 10,000 mark, all major markets were manipulated to give the illusion of recovery. The gullible took it all – hook, line and sinker.

But let me share some common sense logic.

When the so-called economists and financial analysts were trumpeting that there was a global recovery, did you consider what that means in real terms?

If there is an economic recovery, common sense tells us that productive entities, namely companies and national economies must be making money –i.e. firms are making profits and countries are improving their export performance.

And more importantly, if the so-called recovery is a sustainable recovery with economic growth, subsequent policies would no doubt reflect that optimism.

In essence, theory must jive with practice and/or reality.

But, what did we observe? What were the global central banks doing?


« Older Entries

© 2009-2010 Project World Awareness All Rights Reserved -- Copyright notice by Blog Copyright